Is PTFE Safe Now? A 2025 Data-Backed Analysis of 3 Core Myths

Abstract

The safety of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) remains a subject of public and industrial concern, largely due to its historical association with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a processing aid used in its past manufacturing. An examination of current scientific literature and regulatory standards as of 2025 reveals that the material itself, PTFE, is chemically inert, non-toxic, and stable under normal operating conditions. The global fluoropolymer industry has undergone a significant transformation, with the PFOA Stewardship Program leading to the near-complete elimination of PFOA from the manufacturing process. Modern PTFE products, when sourced from reputable manufacturers, are produced without PFOA. The primary health risk associated with PTFE is not from the material itself but from the inhalation of fumes produced when it is heated to extreme temperatures, typically above 300°C (572°F), leading to a condition known as polymer fume fever. For its intended applications in industrial, medical, and food processing contexts, where temperature parameters are controlled, PTFE is considered a safe and highly effective material due to its unparalleled chemical resistance, lubricity, and thermal stability.

Key Takeaways

• Modern PTFE is manufactured without PFOA, the chemical that caused historical health concerns.
• The question of whether PTFE is safe now is answered by its chemical inertness; it is non-toxic and stable.
• PTFE only releases potentially harmful fumes when heated to extreme temperatures well above normal use.
• Ingested flakes from scratched PTFE surfaces are harmless and pass through the body without being absorbed.
• In critical industrial and medical applications, PFOA-free PTFE remains an indispensable and safe material.
• Always source fluoropolymer products from trusted suppliers who can verify their material composition.
• Different fluoropolymers like FEP, PFA, and PVDF offer varied properties for specific engineering needs.

Table of Contents

• Understanding the Core Material: A Deep Dive into Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
• Myth 1: “PTFE Products Continually Release Harmful Toxins.”
• Myth 2: “Scratched or Damaged PTFE Is a Direct Health Hazard.”
• Myth 3: “All Fluoropolymers and Non-Stick Surfaces Carry the Same Risks.”
• Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
• Conclusion
• References

Understanding the Core Material: A Deep Dive into Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

To engage in a meaningful discussion about the safety of any material, one must first develop a foundational understanding of its nature. What is it, precisely, at a molecular level? How is it constructed, and how do those structural characteristics give rise to its observable properties? Polytetrafluoroethylene, commonly known by the trade name Teflon, is a synthetic fluoropolymer of tetrafluoroethylene. Its discovery by Roy J. Plunkett at DuPont in 1938 was accidental, a serendipitous result of research into new refrigerants. Yet, this accidental creation would go on to revolutionize countless industries.

The properties that make PTFE so remarkable—its profound chemical inertness, its extremely low coefficient of friction, its hydrophobic nature, and its high thermal stability—are not magical. They are a direct consequence of its molecular architecture. Imagine a long chain composed of carbon atoms. In most plastics, these carbon atoms are bonded to hydrogen atoms. In PTFE, however, every hydrogen atom is replaced by a fluorine atom. This creates a molecule consisting of a carbon backbone completely sheathed in a tight, dense helix of fluorine atoms. The carbon-fluorine (C-F) bond is one of the strongest single bonds in organic chemistry. This immense bond strength is the very heart of PTFE’s stability. It creates a molecular fortress, making the polymer chain exceptionally resistant to attack by other chemicals. It does not want to react. It is, in a chemical sense, content and stable.

The Spectrum of Fluoropolymers: PTFE, FEP, PFA, and PVDF

While PTFE is the most famous member of its family, it is not the only one. The term “fluoroplastic” encompasses a range of materials, each with unique attributes tailored for specific challenges. Understanding these distinctions is vital for engineers, designers, and procurement specialists. The primary relatives of PTFE are Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene (FEP), Perfluoroalkoxy Alkane (PFA), and Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF).

• PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene): The original and most widely used fluoropolymer. It has the highest operating temperature and the best chemical resistance of the group. However, it has a very high melt viscosity, meaning it does not truly melt and flow like a typical plastic. This property necessitates specialized processing techniques like compression molding, paste extrusion, and sintering.
• FEP (Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene): FEP can be thought of as a melt-processible version of PTFE. It was developed to be processed using conventional methods like injection molding and melt extrusion. While it shares PTFE’s excellent chemical resistance and low friction, its continuous service temperature is slightly lower. It is also optically clearer than PTFE.
• PFA (Perfluoroalkoxy Alkane): PFA combines the best of both worlds. It is melt-processible like FEP but possesses a thermal stability nearly equal to that of PTFE. It also has better creep resistance (resistance to deforming under a constant load) than PTFE, especially at high temperatures. For applications demanding the utmost in chemical purity and high-temperature performance, such as in semiconductor manufacturing, high-performance fluoroplastic tubes made of PFA are often the material of choice.
• PVDF (Polyvinylidene Fluoride): PVDF is structurally different from the “perfluoro” polymers (PTFE, FEP, PFA) because it still contains some hydrogen atoms. This makes it less chemically resistant and gives it a lower service temperature. However, it possesses greater mechanical strength, stiffness, and abrasion resistance. It is also piezoelectric, meaning it generates an electric charge in response to mechanical stress, a property utilized in sensors and transducers.

To clarify these differences, consider the following comparison:

Key Properties and the Question of Safety

The properties listed in the table above are not merely data points for an engineering textbook; they are central to the discussion of whether PTFE is safe now. Its exceptional chemical resistance means it does not break down when it comes into contact with the vast majority of industrial chemicals, bodily fluids, or foodstuffs. It does not leach. Its high service temperature means it remains stable and unchanged far above the boiling point of water. Its low friction and non-stick surface prevent materials from adhering to it, which is crucial for both cooking pans and medical catheters.

The historical anxiety surrounding PTFE has never been about the stable, finished polymer itself. Instead, it has been about a specific chemical used during the manufacturing process—a chemical that, as we will explore, has been systematically eliminated from the modern supply chain. The core of the argument for PTFE’s current safety rests on a critical distinction: the difference between the final polymer product and the processing aids used to make it decades ago.

Myth 1: “PTFE Products Continually Release Harmful Toxins.”

This is perhaps the most pervasive and deeply rooted myth concerning PTFE. It often conjures images of invisible chemicals silently leaching from cookware or industrial components into our food, water, and bodies. This fear, while understandable, is based on a fundamental misunderstanding that conflates the finished PTFE polymer with a now-obsolete manufacturing chemical: Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). To properly address if PTFE is safe now, we must untangle this history.

The PFOA Legacy: Separating the Polymer from the Process

For many decades, PFOA (also known as C8) was used as a surfactant, or processing aid, in the manufacturing of PTFE. Think of it as a type of industrial soap that helped to keep the PTFE particles suspended in water during the polymerization process. The crucial point is that PFOA was not an ingredient of PTFE; it was a tool used to help make it. The goal was always to remove as much of the PFOA as possible from the final product during the manufacturing and curing (sintering) stages.

However, PFOA itself was found to be problematic. It is exceptionally persistent in the environment and has been shown to be a “forever chemical” that can accumulate in the human body. Studies linked long-term PFOA exposure to a number of health issues. The concerns were not about the inert PTFE polymer but about the PFOA that could remain in trace amounts on the final product or, more significantly, be released into the environment from manufacturing facilities (Steenland et al., 2010).

This led to a seismic shift in the industry. In 2006, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) launched the PFOA Stewardship Program. Major fluoropolymer manufacturers voluntarily committed to reducing and ultimately eliminating PFOA emissions and its use in their products. By 2015, this program had achieved its goal, and the use of PFOA in the manufacturing of PTFE and other fluoropolymers was effectively phased out in the United States, Europe, and by other responsible global producers.

Modern PTFE manufacturing utilizes different, less persistent, and less toxic surfactants or employs entirely new dispersion technologies that do not require them at all. Therefore, any PTFE product manufactured today by a reputable company is PFOA-free. The historical problem has been engineered out of the modern material. When you purchase high-quality polytetrafluoroethylene tubing or other components in 2025, you are purchasing a product made with this modern, PFOA-free process.

Thermal Stability Demystified: The Science of PTFE Decomposition

With the PFOA issue resolved, the question then turns to the stability of the PTFE polymer itself. Does it break down under heat? The answer is yes, but only at temperatures far beyond any normal operating range.

As discussed, the strength of the carbon-fluorine bond gives PTFE its remarkable thermal stability. Significant thermal decomposition of PTFE does not begin until it reaches approximately 300°C (572°F) and becomes more rapid above 350°C (662°F) (Kissa, 2001). To put this into perspective:

• Water boils at 100°C (212°F).
• Typical baking temperatures are around 175-220°C (350-425°F).
• Frying or searing food on a stovetop typically occurs between 150-230°C (300-450°F).

Under all these normal conditions, the PTFE polymer is perfectly stable. It does not change. It does not “leach” or “off-gas” any chemicals. A pan left empty on a high burner, however, can exceed these temperatures. If a PTFE-coated pan is heated to above 350°C, it will begin to decompose, releasing a variety of fluorocarbon gases and particulates.

Polymer Fume Fever: A Real but Avoidable Risk

The inhalation of these decomposition fumes can cause a temporary, flu-like illness known as polymer fume fever. Symptoms include chills, fever, headache, and body aches, which typically appear several hours after exposure and resolve on their own within 24 to 48 hours without lasting effects (Shusterman, 1993). While unpleasant, it is important to contextualize this risk. It is not a danger of using PTFE products; it is a danger of severely abusing them through extreme overheating.

This phenomenon is primarily an occupational hazard for those working in industrial settings where PTFE might be heated to very high temperatures without adequate ventilation, such as in welding or certain machining processes. In a domestic or typical industrial setting, reaching these decomposition temperatures is highly unlikely and requires significant negligence, such as leaving an empty pan on a high-heat burner for an extended period.

So, does PTFE release harmful toxins? The answer is a qualified no. The historical toxins (PFOA) are gone from modern manufacturing. The polymer itself is exceptionally stable and only breaks down under extreme, abnormal heat. The risk is not inherent to the material but to its misuse.

Myth 2: “Scratched or Damaged PTFE Is a Direct Health Hazard.”

The second major area of concern revolves around the physical integrity of PTFE coatings and components. What happens when a non-stick pan gets scratched with a metal utensil, or an industrial PTFE liner shows signs of wear? The fear is that the small flakes or particles that might be dislodged will be ingested or enter the environment and cause harm. This concern, like the fear of off-gassing, can be allayed by a deeper look at the fundamental properties of the PTFE polymer.

The Inert Nature of PTFE Flakes

As we have established, the defining characteristic of PTFE is its chemical inertness. It is one of the most non-reactive substances known to science. This property does not change just because the material is in the form of a small flake instead of a solid sheet or tube.

Imagine swallowing a tiny, smooth piece of plastic. This is essentially what happens if one were to ingest a flake of PTFE. Because it is so chemically resistant, it does not react with stomach acid. It is not broken down by digestive enzymes. It is not absorbed by the intestines into the bloodstream. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has long stated that particles of PTFE that may be flaked off and ingested pass harmlessly through the body. They are biologically inert.

Think of it like swallowing sand or dirt. The body does not process it; it simply passes through the digestive system and is excreted. While one should not make a habit of eating flakes from cookware, the accidental ingestion of a few particles poses no toxicological risk. The primary consequence of a scratched PTFE surface is a reduction in its non-stick performance, not a health hazard.

Regulatory Scrutiny: What Agencies Like the FDA and EFSA Say

The safety of PTFE in applications involving contact with food and medical devices is not a matter of corporate opinion; it is subject to rigorous oversight by regulatory agencies around the world. These bodies have examined the evidence for decades and have consistently found the PTFE polymer to be safe for its intended use.

• U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): The FDA has approved PTFE for use in food contact applications, including cookware coatings and food processing equipment. This approval is based on the material’s inertness and stability under cooking temperatures. Many grades of PTFE are also approved for use in medical devices, a testament to their biocompatibility. When a material is deemed safe enough to be used for implants, sutures, and catheters inside the human body, its safety for incidental food contact is well-established.
• European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): Similarly, in Europe, EFSA regulates food contact materials. The regulations (such as Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food) set strict limits and testing requirements. PTFE is permitted for use, provided it meets these standards, which include migration tests to ensure that no harmful substances transfer from the plastic to the food in significant quantities. Given PTFE’s inert nature, it easily passes these tests.

The consensus among these expert bodies is clear: the finished PTFE polymer is not a source of concern for food safety. The regulatory focus, correctly, was on the PFOA processing aid, which has now been addressed by the industry.

Environmental Fate: The Persistence and Impact of PTFE

A more nuanced question arises when considering the environmental impact of PTFE particles. If a flake of PTFE is washed down the drain or discarded, what happens to it? Because of its extreme durability and chemical resistance, PTFE does not readily biodegrade. It will persist in the environment for a very long time, much like other plastics.

This has led to concerns about microplastics. PTFE particles would indeed contribute to the overall burden of microplastics in the environment. However, it is important to distinguish between the physical presence of these particles and any chemical toxicity. Unlike PFOA, which is water-soluble and can be taken up by organisms, solid PTFE particles are not bioavailable in the same way. They are stable solids that do not leach chemicals into the water or soil.

The environmental concern regarding PTFE is therefore one of physical pollution, common to all plastics, rather than chemical pollution. The solution to this lies in the responsible use and disposal of all plastic products, not in singling out a chemically inert polymer. The far greater environmental danger associated with fluorochemicals came from the manufacturing emissions of PFOA and related compounds, a problem that, as noted, has been largely mitigated through process changes.

In the context of industrial applications, where materials like PTFE are used for their durability and longevity, the environmental calculus is different. A PTFE-lined pipe or vessel that lasts for decades, preventing leaks of corrosive chemicals, has a net positive environmental impact compared to a less-resistant material that would fail and require frequent replacement, leading to more waste and potential spills. The durability that leads to environmental persistence is the very same property that makes it a responsible choice for long-term, critical infrastructure.

Myth 3: “All Fluoropolymers and Non-Stick Surfaces Carry the Same Risks.”

The public discourse surrounding PTFE has often painted all “non-stick” technologies with a single, broad brush. This generalization is both inaccurate and unhelpful. It obscures the significant differences in chemistry, manufacturing, and application that exist within the world of fluoropolymers and across the wider landscape of non-stick coatings. Answering the question “Is PTFE safe now?” requires a more precise and differentiated understanding of these materials.

The Rise of PFOA-Free Manufacturing: A Global Shift

As we have detailed, the pivotal change in the safety profile of PTFE was the global phase-out of PFOA. This was not a minor adjustment; it was a fundamental re-engineering of the manufacturing process. A reputable fluoropolymer manufacturer today operates in a completely different regulatory and technological environment than one from 20 years ago.

This shift has created a clear dividing line. Products from the “PFOA era” carried a risk associated with that specific chemical. Products from the modern, PFOA-free era do not. This distinction is paramount. It is no longer accurate to assess a modern PTFE product based on the legacy issues of PFOA.

Furthermore, the “non-stick” market itself has diversified. Today, consumers and industrial clients can choose from a variety of surfaces:

• Modern PTFE: PFOA-free, still offering the highest levels of non-stick performance and chemical resistance.
• Ceramic Coatings: These are typically sol-gel coatings made from silica and other inorganic materials. They offer good non-stick properties and high heat resistance but are generally less durable and less resistant to chemical attack than PTFE. They have never used PFOA.
• Silicone: A polymer based on silicon and oxygen. It is flexible, non-stick, and heat-resistant, often used for bakeware and utensils.
• Hard-Anodized Aluminum: An electrochemical process that makes the aluminum surface harder and more durable, creating a surface that is more stick-resistant than plain aluminum, though not truly “non-stick” like PTFE.

Each of these has its own profile of strengths and weaknesses. Lumping them all together ignores the specific science behind each one. PTFE, FEP, and PFA stand in a class of their own for extreme chemical and thermal demands, a domain where ceramic or silicone coatings cannot compete.

Beyond Cookware: The Industrial Imperative for Safe PTFE

While the public debate has been dominated by cookware, the vast majority of PTFE produced is used in demanding industrial, technical, and medical applications. In these fields, the safety and reliability of the material are not just matters of convenience; they are often matters of operational integrity and human safety.

Consider the following applications where modern, PFOA-free PTFE is indispensable:

• Chemical Processing: Large chemical reactors, pipes, and valves are lined with PTFE or PFA to handle highly corrosive acids and bases. A failure in this lining could lead to a catastrophic spill of hazardous materials. The unmatched chemical inertness of PTFE is the primary safety feature here.
• Medical Devices: PTFE’s lubricity (slipperiness) and biocompatibility make it ideal for catheters that navigate blood vessels, for surgical meshes used in tissue repair, and for grafts that replace arteries. The material must be completely non-toxic and non-reactive with human tissue. The FDA’s approval of PTFE for such uses underscores its safety.
• Wire and Cable Insulation: In aerospace and high-performance electronics, wires are often coated with PTFE. Its excellent dielectric properties prevent short circuits, and its high-temperature resistance prevents the insulation from melting in demanding environments, ensuring system reliability from aircraft to data centers.
• Semiconductor Manufacturing: The fabrication of microchips requires the use of ultra-pure chemicals. The pipes, tubes, and vessel linings used to transport these chemicals must be completely non-reactive to avoid contaminating the process. PFA and high-purity PTFE are the industry standards because they do not leach ions or other impurities.

In all these high-stakes contexts, the question is not just “Is PTFE safe?” but “Is there a safer or more reliable alternative?” For many of the most demanding applications on Earth, the answer is still no. The combination of properties offered by PTFE, FEP, and PFA remains unique. The decision to use these materials is based on a rigorous engineering assessment where their stability and inertness are precisely the reasons they are chosen. When sourcing for such critical systems, professionals turn to specialized suppliers who can provide a wide range of products, from extruded tubes to custom injection molded parts, all with certified material integrity. A visit to a comprehensive supplier like our website shows the breadth of solutions available to modern industry.

Material Selection in High-Stakes Industries

An engineer designing a system to handle hydrofluoric acid is not concerned about scratching a pan. They are concerned with preventing a leak that could endanger workers and the environment. A medical device designer is not worried about a pan overheating; they are worried about ensuring a catheter does not cause a blood clot.

The risk analysis in these fields is far more stringent than in consumer goods. The fact that PFOA-free PTFE, FEP, and PFA are not just used but are the preferred materials in these sectors is perhaps the most powerful testament to their safety and reliability. These industries have already done the work. They have assessed the data, tested the materials, and concluded that for their purposes, the performance and safety profile of modern fluoropolymers is unmatched.

Therefore, the myth that all non-stick surfaces are the same is demonstrably false. Not only are the materials chemically distinct, but their applications and the associated risk assessments are worlds apart. The conversation about PTFE safety in 2025 must move beyond the kitchen and acknowledge its role as a high-performance engineering material that has been made safer through decades of scientific advancement and regulatory action.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is PFOA still used in the manufacturing of PTFE products in 2025?

No. As a result of the EPA’s PFOA Stewardship Program and similar international regulations like the EU’s REACH, major global manufacturers completely phased out the use of PFOA as a processing aid by 2015. Modern PTFE products from reputable sources are manufactured using different, less persistent surfactants or through processes that do not require such aids at all.

What actually happens if I accidentally swallow a small flake from a scratched PTFE pan?

If you ingest a small flake of PTFE, it will pass through your digestive system unchanged. PTFE is chemically and biologically inert, meaning it does not react with stomach acids or enzymes and is not absorbed by the body. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers this incidental ingestion to be non-toxic.

Are there any health risks from PTFE at all?

The primary health risk associated with PTFE is not from the material itself but from its decomposition fumes. If PTFE is heated to extreme temperatures (generally above 300°C / 572°F), it can release fumes that cause a temporary, flu-like condition called polymer fume fever. This risk is avoidable by using PTFE products within their specified temperature limits and ensuring proper ventilation in industrial settings where high temperatures are used.

Why is PTFE still used in medical implants if there have been safety concerns?

The safety concerns were historically linked to PFOA, a manufacturing aid, not the final PTFE polymer. The PTFE material itself is exceptionally biocompatible and inert, meaning it does not react with human tissue. This makes it an ideal material for medical applications like surgical grafts, sutures, and catheters. Its use in such critical, regulated devices highlights its proven safety and reliability.

How can I be sure the PTFE products I buy for my business are safe and PFOA-free?

The most effective way is to source your materials from a well-established, reputable supplier or manufacturer who can provide material data sheets and certificates of compliance. These documents verify the material’s properties and confirm that it adheres to current regulatory standards, such as being PFOA-free. Avoid generic, unbranded products with no traceable origin.

What is the difference between PTFE, PFA, and FEP tubing?

All three are fluoropolymers, but they have key differences. PTFE has the highest temperature resistance but cannot be melt-processed. FEP is melt-processible but has a lower service temperature. PFA offers a combination of high-temperature resistance similar to PTFE while also being melt-processible, making it ideal for high-purity and high-stress applications.

Is PTFE environmentally friendly?

This is a complex question. On one hand, PTFE is extremely durable, meaning products made from it have a long service life, reducing waste from replacements. On the other hand, like most plastics, it is not biodegradable and can contribute to microplastic pollution if not disposed of properly. Its primary environmental benefit lies in its use in industrial settings, where its chemical resistance prevents leaks of hazardous materials.

Conclusion

The journey of polytetrafluoroethylene, from an accidental laboratory discovery to a ubiquitous material of modern life, has been marked by both extraordinary utility and persistent controversy. The question that has lingered for decades—is PTFE safe now?—demands an answer grounded not in the anxieties of the past, but in the scientific and manufacturing realities of the present. As of 2025, the evidence provides a clear and affirmative response.

The narrative of risk that has long shadowed PTFE was fundamentally a story about PFOA, a processing aid that has been decisively engineered out of the modern supply chain. The global fluoropolymer industry, under regulatory pressure and through its own initiative, has transitioned to new chemistries and technologies. To continue to judge today’s advanced, PFOA-free material by the standards of its obsolete production methods is to miss the most important chapter of its story: a successful industrial transformation toward greater safety.

The PTFE polymer itself remains what it has always been at a molecular level: a remarkably stable, chemically inert, and non-toxic substance. Its strength is its stability. Flakes that are inadvertently ingested pass through the body without effect. Its surface, approved for contact with our food and even for use inside our bodies as medical implants, does not leach harmful substances under normal conditions. The only established risk—polymer fume fever—is not a feature of daily use but a consequence of extreme and abnormal overheating, a scenario that is both rare and avoidable.

In the high-stakes arenas of medicine, aerospace, chemical processing, and electronics, PTFE and its fluoropolymer cousins are not merely used; they are indispensable. They are chosen precisely for their safety and reliability, for their ability to perform under conditions where lesser materials would fail, potentially with catastrophic consequences. The confidence of these industries, built on decades of rigorous testing and real-world performance, serves as a powerful testament to the material’s integrity. The conversation must therefore evolve, moving beyond a singular focus on cookware to appreciate PTFE’s role as a cornerstone of modern engineering, enabling technologies that define our world. The challenge is no longer one of inherent toxicity, but of responsible sourcing—partnering with manufacturers who adhere to the highest standards—and of proper use within the material’s well-understood limits.

References

Kissa, E. (2001). Fluorinated surfactants and repellents (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

Shusterman, D. J. (1993). Polymer fume fever. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 80(1), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1993.11701768

Steenland, K., Fletcher, T., & Savitz, D. A. (2010). Epidemiologic evidence on the health effects of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(8), 1100–1108. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901827

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2022). Fact Sheet: 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/fact-sheet-20102015-pfoa-stewardship-program

DoonX. (2025). PTFE (Teflon): Properties, applications, & uses. doonx.com

Machining PTFE. (2025). 5 common teflon forming processes and applications. machiningptfe.com

European Commission. (2011). Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. Official Journal of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/10/oj

Zhi, Y., & Hounjet, L. J. (2024). A review of current and future non-PFAS alternatives for fluoropolymers. ACS Polymers Au, 4(1), 2–18.